Once you have
abandoned ‘what to think’, in the beginning, you will feel
clueless. It’s the
same cluelessness that you felt as a kid when looking at an
elaborate puzzle for
the first time. You do not know a pattern with which to
solve it
immediately. But once you believe you can do it and take up the
challenge, you end
up solving it. Three things happen afterwards:
- The second time you solve the same puzzle, you might end up solving it in a different way from the first time. Your memory may have failed to capture all the steps in your first success, so you can’t repeat them. But, after several repetitions, you would learn to solve the puzzle with some definite patterns. Similarly, as you apply your thinking to solve a problem or create your perception of something, you would, by repetitions, at some point discover a few patterns which would loyally serve your mental faculties in solving similar puzzles in an efficient manner.
- These patterns might not solve all puzzles.
- The more elaborate the problem, the more evolved the patterns are forced to become. The same applies to perceptions. With an issue that has more complexities, you might have to rethink the entire pattern.
Most of all, ‘how to
think’ means allowing the data to make you think; not your preconceived notions
dictating to you how to feel about data. You learn only when you are open to
learning. To develop how to think, you would have to focus on the contents of
the problem with absolute disregard for your personal judgements, biases and
prejudices. Only then can a new pattern and a new understanding take birth.
How to think
differently is an ability that has to be personally developed by you with your
own thinking. You’re going to come up with your own patterns. This doesn’t mean
they wouldn’t have existed before; it would mean that the patterns you have
come up with would serve you the most and the best.
Comments
Post a Comment